ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of WeChat group management on blood pressure control rate and drug compliance of hypertension patients during the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) . Methods A total of 428 consecutive patients with essential hypertension in our outpatient department from Jan. 2020 to Dec. 2020 were enrolled and randomly divided into experimental group and control group with a ratio of 1 : 1. There were 214 patients in the experimental group, 110 males and 104 females, with an average age of (55.48+/-6.11) years. There were 214 cases in the control group, 108 males and 106 females, with an average age of (56.52+/-5.19) years. WeChat groups were established for the 2 groups separately. Information on education, supervised medication and lifestyle of hypertension was provided to the patients in the experimental group through WeChat, while no active intervention was given to the control group. The blood pressure control rate and medication possession ratio (MPR) were calculated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months of intervention, and the differences between the 2 groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences in the blood pressure control rate (91.12%195/214 vs 90.65% 194/214, 86.67%182/210vs 89.62%190/212or MPR (0.90+/-0.03 vs 0.90+/-0.05, 0.85+/-0.04 vs 0.88+/-0.03) between the 2 groups at 1 or 3 months of intervention (all P>0.05). At 6 and 12 months, the blood pressure control rate (81.73%170/208vs 88.57%186/210,75.12%154/205vs 85.99%178/207) and MPR (0.74+/-0.04 vs 0.87+/-0.05, 0.58+/-0.05 vs 0.85+/-0.03) of patients in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion During the COVID-19 epidemic, WeChat group management of hypertension patients by doctors could improve patients' blood pressure control rate and drug compliance and strengthen patients' self-management ability.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aims: Trauma is particularly prevalent amongst Early Intervention (EI) patients and is associated with adverse clinical and prognostic outcomes. To determine the feasibility of a large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an 'EMDR for psychosis' intervention for trauma survivors with active psychotic symptoms supported by EI services, we conducted a single-blind RCT comparing 16 sessions of EMDRp + TAU versus TAU only. Method(s): EMDRp therapy and trial assessments were completed both in-person and remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, and key feasibility outcomes (recruitment & retention, therapy attendance/ engagement, adherence to EMPRp treatment protocol, and the 'promise of efficacy' of EMDRp on relevant clinical outcomes) were examined at 6- and 12-month post-randomization assessments. Results and Conclusion(s): 60 participants (100% of the recruitment target) received TAU or EMDR + TAU. The feasibility criteria examined in this trial were fully met, and EMDRp was associated with promising signals of efficacy on a range of valuable post-treatment outcomes, including improved psychotic symptoms (PANSS), subjective recovery (QPR), post-traumatic symptoms (PCL-5;ITQ), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and general health status (EQ-5D-VAS) at the 6-month assessment. Signals of efficacy at 12-month were less pronounced, but remained robust for trauma symptoms and general health status. The findings will be discussed with relevance to future clinical trials of trauma-focused therapy in clients with early psychosis, and the provision of more tailored trauma therapies for EI service users.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Developing a control group of a clinical trial using real world data is desirable and ethically sound despite challenges pertaining to internal validity. To examine the internal validity, we reproduced the control group in a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) using Electric Health Record (EHR) data and evaluated the difference between the outcome of the original trial and that of the reproduced analysis. Method(s): We selected an RCT, REMDACTA trial, that was performed to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab plus remdesivir against placebo plus remdesivir in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. We reproduced its control group (patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia taking only remdesivir), using Japanese EHR data, Millennial Medical Record provided by Life Data Initiative. Target patients for the main analysis were those prescribed remdesivir within 2 days after admission and diagnosed with COVID-19 (defined by ICD-10 code, U07.1) and/or with COVID-19 pneumonia (defined by diagnosis name). Patients in the sub analysis included only those with COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis. Among the target patients, those undergoing image inspection, oxygen administration, and not taking any medicines for pneumonia before the first remdesivir prescription were eligible for the analyses. Median length of stay was compared in the reproduced group and in REMDACTA trial. Result(s): The database included 676 and 110 target patients for the main and sub analyses, respectively. However, only 57 and 14 patients met the eligibility criteria for the main and sub analyses, respectively. The reduction in the number of patients is attributed to the criteria of image inspection and oxygen administration. Median length of stay in the reproduced group were 13 and 11 days in the main and sub analyses, respectively. In REMDACTA trial, 95% CI of median time was 11.0-16.0. Conclusion(s): We successfully reproduced the median time of the control group by EHR data.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic worldwide forced governments to undertake intervention measures to encourage social distancing. Meanwhile, traumatic skin lacerations require multiple hospital visits for dressing, changings, and suture removal since they are usually repaired with non-absorbable sutures. In a matter of fact, these visits can be avoided by using absorbable sutures instead. However, absorbable sutures carry the theoretical risk of wound infection. In this study, our aim was to determine whether absorbable sutures are better than non-absorbable sutures in repairing lacerations during the COVID-19 pandemic. The first and second objectives were to assess the rate of infection and the number of postoperative hospital visits. Method(s): A sample of 469 patients with traumatic skin lacerations were analysed during the COVID-19 pandemic in April-July 2020. In the control group, wounds were repaired using non-absorbable sutures, while rapid-onset absorbable sutures were used in the treatment group. By conducting a phone call follow-up after 21 days, several parameters regarding infection signs and hospital visits were compared between both groups. Result(s): No statistically significant difference was observed between both groups regarding wound infection (p-value= 0.623). Using absorbable sutures resulted in fewer postoperative hospital visits than non-absorbable sutures (p-value= 0.001). This study is limited because the assessment of wound infection was subjective to the patient by a phone call follow-up. Conclusion(s): Using absorbable sutures to close traumatic skin lacerations is safe. They should be considered during a pandemic to reduce hospital visits for suture removal, which will subsequently enhance social distancing and relieve hospital load.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has altered people's lifestyles around the world. Prevention of recurrent episodes of the disease and mitigation of its consequences are especially associated with effective post-COVID-19 rehabilitation in patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of the drug Likopid (glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptide, GMDP) for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation in patients. Material and methods. Patients who recovered from mild to moderate COVID-19 (n=60, mean age 54+/- 11.7 years) were randomized into the observation group (n=30, 15 men and 15 women) who received 2 courses of Licopid (1 mg twice a day) and the comparison group (n=30, 15 men and 15 women). Analysis of the phenotypic and functional characteristics of the innate immune cellular factors was carried out before the start of immunomodulatory therapy, immediately after the end of the course, and also after 6 months observations. In order to assess the quality of life of all patients, we used the SF-36 Health Status Survey and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaires. Results. During assessing the effect of immunomodulatory therapy on the parameters of innate immunity of patients at the stage of rehabilitation after COVID-19, an increase in the protective cytolytic activity of CD16+ and CD8+Gr+ cells, as well as a persistent increase in TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 expression was found, which indicates the antigen recognition recovery and presentation at the level of the monocytic link of the immune system. The use of GMDP as an immunomodulatory agent resulted in an 8-fold reduction in the frequency and severity of respiratory infections due to an increase in the total monocyte count. As a result of assessing patients' quality of life against the background of the therapy, a positive dynamic in role functioning was revealed in patients. In the general assessment of their health status, an increase in physical and mental well-being was noted during 6 months of observation. The comparison group showed no improvement in the psychoemotional state. Discussion. The study demonstrated the effectiveness of GMDP immunomodulatory therapy in correcting immunological parameters for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation in patients. The data obtained are consistent with the previously discovered ability of GMDP to restore impaired functions of phagocytic cells and induce the expression of their surface activation markers, which in turn contributes to an adequate response to pathogens. Conclusion. The study revealed that the correction of immunological parameters with the use of GMDP in COVID-19 convalescents contributed not only to a decrease in the frequency and severity of respiratory infections, but also to an improvement in the psycho-emotional state of patients, and a decrease in anxiety and depression.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2023. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: A LSR is a systematic review that is continually updated, incorporating new evidence as it becomes available. They are conducted in research areas where new evidence is constantly emerging on diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes. The objective of this study was to understand the current application of LSRs across research areas. Method(s): Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched to identify LSRs. Only the most recent update of a LSR was included. Data regarding the indication, intervention, methods, frequency of updates, and funding were extracted. Result(s): Of the 1,243 records identified, 126 LSRs were included for analysis. The first LSR was published in 2015, with a significant increase in the number of LSRs published starting in 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common indication represented by LSRs was COVID-19 (72%), followed by oncology (10%). Other indications with LSRs included chronic pain, traumatic brain injury, and skin disorders, among others. While most oncology LSRs identified interventional randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) (85%), only 54% of COVID-19 LSRs were restricted to interventional studies, including a combination of RCTS and real-world observational studies. Oncology LSRs included common cancers such as prostate, renal, or multiple myeloma. Of the reviews that reported update frequency, 28% planned monthly, 12% yearly, and 12% weekly updates. Only 46% of LSRs were registered. The majority of LSRs were funded by government or research organizations. Objectives of LSRs varied, with most stating the need to maintain up-to-date databases;however, several studies used LSRs to facilitate network meta-analysis or mixed treatment comparisons. Conclusion(s): While LSRs were introduced over five years ago, their frequency increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Apart from COVID-19, LSRs are commonly used in oncology settings. LSRs provide high-level, relevant, and up-to-date evidence, making them a useful tool for clinical and real-world research.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: Representing diverse perspectives in medical publications is of great importance. We assessed diversity among investigators, study participants, authors and tweeters of recent publications on COVID-19 vaccine trials, a topic likely to have significant global implications. Research design and methods: Primary publications reporting on COVID vaccine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via PubMed (n=302 hits, 23 September 2022). The 100 articles with the greatest impact (Altmetric score) were selected for evaluation. National affiliation of authors and investigators, and demographics of participants were collected. Geographic locations of Tweets mentioning the publications were collected via Altmetric. Result(s): In our preliminary analysis, as expected, selected publications most frequently appeared in top-tier journals, e.g. New England Journal of Medicine (n=24) and Lancet (n=19), and had high Altmetric scores (median 886, range 30-29,153). Articles included authors from mean 2.2 countries, most frequently the USA (n=43 articles), the UK (n=31) and China (n=23). Investigators' locations were often not reported, but most frequent were the UK (n=2711 investigators), USA (n=1029) and South Africa (n=269). There was a gender balance among participants across the studies (mean 49.4% female). The most frequent ethnic groups were white, Hispanic and Asian. Tweets mentioning the publications most commonly came from the USA (8.1%), the UK (3.1%) and Japan (2.9%). Conclusion(s): Despite COVID-19 being a global health emergency, most authors, investigators and readers of high impact COVID-19 vaccine RCT publications were from a small group of countries, with some notable exceptions. Numerous studies did not report the geographic location of investigators or participant ethnicity. Consistent and transparent reporting would support the drive towards greater diversity and representation in medical research.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: de Quervain's syndrome is a painful condition commonly presented to hand therapists. Exercise is utilised as an intervention, but isometric exercise has not been investigated. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of isometric thumb extension exercise for de Quervain's syndrome and to explore differences between high-load and low-load isometric exercise. Method(s): This parallel-group randomised clinical feasibility trial included individuals with de Quervain's syndrome. All participants underwent a 2 week washout period where they received an orthosis, education, and range of motion exercises. Eligible participants were then randomised to receive high or low-load isometric thumb extension exercises, performed daily for 4 weeks. Feasibility and safety were assessed by recruitment and drop-out rates, adherence, adverse events, and participant feedback via semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes for pain and function, and blinded assessment of range of motion and strength. Result(s): Twenty-eight participants were randomised. There were no drop-outs after randomisation, and no serious adverse events. Adherence to exercise was 86.7%, with 84% of participants stating they would choose to participate again. There were clinically and statistically significant improvements in pain and function over time (p < 0.001) but not in range of motion or strength. There were no statistically significant between-group differences. Conclusion(s): Isometric thumb extension exercise within a multimodal approach appears a safe and feasible intervention for people with de Quervain's syndrome. A large multi-centre trial would be required to compare high- and low-load isometric exercises. Further research investigating exercise and multimodal interventions in this population is warranted.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.
ABSTRACT
Background/aims: Controlled DCD organ donation (cDCD) is a strategic target for the Italian transplantation network. Italian peculiarities in cDCD donation make published results questionable and raise concern over organ ischemic damage. Consequently, normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) has been strongly recommended in potential cDCD donors. In 2019 the randomized multicenter DONARE study was designed to describe ischemic-reperfusion and inflammatory biomarkers during NRP and to test the potential benefit of apheresis by an adsorbent filter (CytoSorb) included in the NRP circuit. The aim of this report is to describe the modulation of the clinical characteristics and of the NRP in the DONARE study enrolled cases. Method(s): The study protocol was defined by the DCD national working group and proposed to all the Italian DCD donation centers. The coordinating center (CNT) has monitored the evolving cDCD activity to preserve the study capacity of representing the Italian scenario. Samples have been blindly centralized to an independent laboratory for cytokines profiling. The outcomes of transplanted organs have been recorded in the national quality database. Result(s): From September 2020 to June 2022, 27 out of the 40 planned cases have been enrolled in six centers: 4 in 2020, 12 in 2021 and 11 within June 2022. Approval is still pending in other centers. Main causes of exclusion among potential cDCD donors were: age above 65 (in 2020), e-CPR prior- to-death, shortage in personnel and COVID-19 restrictions. The age limit for enrolment (<65yrs) was abolished by amendment due to the national trend: mean age of enrolled cases increased from 57+/-6 in 2020 to 67+/-6 years in 2022. Mean NRP duration decreased from 223,3+/-39,2 in 2020 to 168,9+/-42,6 minutes in 2022;serial samples (4/2 with/without Cytosorb, from T0 to T4) from different points of the NRP circuit have been completed throughout the procedure in all the cases. All the enrolled cases became utilized donors. No study-related adverse event has been reported. Conclusion(s): Coordination of multicenter studies in the rapidly evolving scenario of controlled DCD donation should take advantage of continuous monitoring of real-life procedures and auditing of adherence to operational recommendations. The interim evaluation confirms the feasibility and safety of the study.
ABSTRACT
Aim: To determine the attitude of medical practitioners towards collaborating with dental professionals during a pandemic. Material(s) and Method(s): The present study is a cross sectional survey conducted among the medical practitioners of India. 2100 medical practitioners were randomly selected as study subjects. The data pertaining to their attitude toward collaboration with dental professionals were gathered using a self-administered questionnaire. Data was analyzed using descriptive studies. Result(s): Among the study subjects, 93% of the medical doctors said in the future if the pandemic occurs then they would feel contended if they were to be given the provision to be aided by a well-trained dental support team, 80% of them said they experienced high stress during the pandemic. When asked to specify the reason in case they have not approached the dentist during the pandemic, 89% said they did not ponder over the thought of taking help from the dentist. Conclusion(s): If a pandemic occurs in the future, the contribution of the dentist can be beyond dentistry provided we adopt and execute proper measures and plan them beforehand.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.
ABSTRACT
Background & Aim: The long-term effects of human mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) treatment on COVID-19 patients have not been fully characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a MSC treatment administered to severe COVID-19 patients enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT 04288102). Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): A total of 100 patients experiencing severe COVID-19 received either MSC treatment (n = 65, 4x107 cells per infusion) or a placebo (n = 35) combined with standard of care on days 0, 3, and 6. Patients were subsequently evaluated 18 and 24 months after treatment to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the MSC treatment. The outcomes measured included: 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), lung imaging, quality of life according to the Short Form 36 questionnaire, COVID-19-related symptoms, titers of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, MSC-related adverse events (AEs), and tumor markers. Two years after treatment, a marginally smaller proportion of patients had a 6-MWD below the lower limit of the normal range in the MSC group than in the placebo group (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.80, Fisher's exact test, p = 0.015). On the SF-36 questionnaire, a marginally higher general health score was received by the MSC group at month 18 compared with the placebo group (50.00 vs. 35.00;95% CI: 0.00-20.00, Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.016). In contrast, there were no differences in the total severity score of lung imaging or the titer of neutralizing antibodies between the two groups. Meanwhile, there were no MSC-related AEs reported at the 18- or 24-month follow-ups. The serum levels of most of the tumor markers examined remained within normal ranges and were similar between the MSC and placebo groups. Long-term safety was observed for the COVID-19 patients who received MSC treatment. Yet few sustained efficacy of MSC treatment was observed at the end of the 2-year follow-up period. Funding(s): The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA1105604, 2020YFC0860900), the specific research fund of The Innovation Platform for Academicians of Hainan Province (YSPTZX202216) and the Fund of National Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases, PLA General Hospital (NCRCID202105,413FZT6). [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
ABSTRACT
Although the effect of face masks on preventing airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is well studied, no study has evaluated their effect on blood pressure (BP). Therefore, we investigated the effect of surgical masks on BP in 265 treated hypertensive patients. Following the routine mask-on office BP measurement, patients were left alone and randomized to automated office BP measurement, with measurements taken after first wearing a mask for 10 min, then without wearing the mask for 10 min, and vice versa. Among the participants, 115 were women (43.4%), the mean age was 62 +/- 12 years, and the mean office BP was 134 +/- 15/81 +/- 12 mmHg. There was no significant difference between mask-on unattended systolic BP (133 +/- 15 mmHg) and mask-off unattended systolic BP (132 +/- 15 mmHg) (P = 0.13) or between mask-on unattended diastolic BP (77 +/- 13 mmHg) and mask-off unattended diastolic BP (76 +/- 13 mmHg) (P = 0.32). Surgical masks had no effect on BP in treated hypertensive patients.Copyright © 2022 Krause und Pachernegg GmbH. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: This work was devoted to an in silico investigation conducted on twenty-eight Tacrine-hydroxamate derivatives as a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease using DFT and QSAR modeling techniques. Method(s): The data set was randomly partitioned into a training set (22 compounds) and a test set (6 compounds). Then, fourteen models were built and were used to compute the predicted pIC50 of compounds belonging to the test set. Result(s): Al built models were individualy validated using both internal and external validation methods, including the Y-Randomization test and Golbraikh and Tropsha's model acceptance criteria. Then, one model was selected for its higher R2, R2test, and Q2cv values (R2 = 0.768, R2adj = 0.713, MSE = 0.304, R2test=0.973, Q2cv = 0.615). From these outcomes, the activity of the studied compounds toward the main protease of Cholinesterase (AChEs) seems to be influenced by 4 descriptors, i.e., the total dipole moment of the molecule (mu), number of rotatable bonds (RB), molecular topology radius (MTR) and molecular topology polar surface area (MTPSA). The effect of these descriptors on the activity was studied, in particular, the increase in the total dipole moment and the topological radius of the molecule and the reduction of the rotatable bond and topology polar surface area increase the activity. Conclusion(s): Some newly designed compounds with higher AChEs inhibitory activity have been designed based on the best-proposed QSAR model. In addition, ADMET pharmacokinetic properties were carried out for the proposed compounds, the toxicity results indicate that 7 molecules are nontoxic.Copyright © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.
ABSTRACT
The current outbreak of COVID-19 is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that has affected > 210 countries. Various steps are taken by different countries to tackle the current war-like health situation. In India, the Ministry of AYUSH released a self-care advisory for immunomodulation measures during the COVID-19 and this review article discusses the detailed scientific rationale associated with this advisory. Authors have spotted and presented in-depth insight of advisory in terms of immunomodulatory, antiviral, antibacterial, co-morbidity associated actions, and their probable mechanism of action. Immunomodulatory actions of advised herbs with no significant adverse drug reaction/toxicity strongly support the extension of advisory for COVID-19 prevention, prophylaxis, mitigations, and rehabilitation capacities. This advisory also emphasized Dhyana (meditation) and Yogasanas as a holistic approach in enhancing immunity, mental health, and quality of life. The present review may open-up new meadows for research and can provide better conceptual leads for future researches in immunomodulation, antiviral-development, psychoneuroimmunology, especially for COVID-19.Copyright © 2021, Institute of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical effect and safety of Suhexiang Pills () in the treatment of patients with tachycardia after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Methods A total of 138 patients with tachycardia after SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to eight hospitals such as 971st Hospital of the PLA Navy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Chest Hospital from February 2023 to March 2023 were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, with 87 patients in the treatment group and 51 in the control group. Patients in the control group were po administered with betaloc, once a day, and the initial dose was 23.75 mg, adjusted in time according to the patient's heart rate. Patients in the treatment group were po administered with Suhexiang Pills, 1 pill/time, twice daily. Patients in two groups were treated for 7 d. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed, and the heart rate and cardiac function indexes, RR interval, blood oxygen saturation and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of the treatment group was 98.85%, and the total effective rate of the control group was 90.20%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, heart rates were significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.05), and the heart rates of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the control group (P < 0.05) on the 7th day of treatment. After treatment, the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in both groups was significantly higher than that before treatment (P < 0.05), and there was statistical difference between the treatment group and the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) in the treatment group significantly decreased than that before treatment (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference compared with the control group (P > 0.05). After treatment, the maximum RR interval in both groups reached the normal range on the third day, and the treatment group was significantly better than the control group (P < 0.05). Blood oxygen saturation of the treatment group was significantly increased on the 7th day of treatment compared with before treatment (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse events between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Suhexiang Pills decrease heart rates in patients with tachycardia after SARS-CoV-2 infection, which was equivalent to the effect of western medicine, and can protect heart, improve heart function to a certain extent.Copyright © 2023 Editorial Office of Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 was first detected in December 2019 and rapidly spread to become a pandemic. The disease associated with this infection (COVID-19) disproportionally affect pregnant people and their offspring, making them a high-risk group for morbidity and mortality. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of progression to severe/critical disease and maternal death. It is also associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including hypertensive disorders and prematurity. While vaccination is one of the most effective approaches to stem the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant people were originally excluded from all randomized vaccine trials. Following studies examining the effects of COVID vaccine in pregnancy have focused on three general areas: maternal and fetal antibody production, short-term fetal safety, and overall pregnancy outcomes. In this presentation, we will summarize the COVID-19 disease phenotype in pregnancy, describe the association between COVID-19 and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and describe the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 therapeutics and vaccines in pregnancy.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Urine drug testing has been the standard for monitoring opioid compliance in chronic pain patients. The COVID-19 pandemic created a dilemma for opioid monitoring by severely limiting in-person testing due to safety concerns. Oral fluid toxicology emerged as a feasible, alternative test due to its ability for remote sample collection under virtual supervision while minimizing infringements on patient privacy. However, the efficacy of these two tests for reliably detecting opioids should be explored prior to transitioning to testing only with oral fluids. Method(s): In this study, we compared morphine levels in oral fluid and urine toxicology studies from 5 randomly selected patients from a Chronic Pain Center who were regularly taking high doses (>=90 mEq) of extended-release morphine. Charts from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic until July 2022 were reviewed for urine and oral fluid testing results and medication regimens. All oral fluid and urine test results and collection methods were validated by a nationally recognized toxicology lab. Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) reports were reviewed for each patient to observe pre-testing prescription trends. Result(s): We found that the overwhelming majority of patients had at least 1 false negative oral fluid test result. The remainder of the oral fluid results were below threshold (10 ng/mL) or ranged from 11.3 to 54 ng/mL of morphine. 80% of patients (n = 5) had at least one negative or positive-but-below-threshold (10 ng/mL) result in their oral fluid sample analyses. In contrast, none of the urine studies had negative results. Urine studies for all patients were positive for morphine and well-above primary cutoff values (100 ng/mL) with levels >6000 ng/mL. PMP reports did not reveal any aberrant drug taking behavior in any of the patients. No unprescribed medications or illicit substances were detected in any of the oral or urine samples. Conclusion(s): The prevalence of false negative results for the detection of morphine metabolites in oral fluid toxicology may be higher than clinicians are currently aware of. Physicians and other providers monitoring opioid compliance in chronic pain patients should keep this possibility in mind when selecting toxicology tests and making conclusions about aberrant drug-taking behavior. Larger scale studies are needed to compare oral fluid and urine levels of morphine with extension to other commonly prescribed opioids. Disclosure: Evan Chung, MD: None, Joseph Valenza, MD: NoneCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Worldwide, infectious diseases have contributed significantly to morbidity and mortality;among the leading causes of death are pneumonia, respiratory infections and Covid-19. Stem cell therapy will be used to treat virus-infected patients in an effective and safe manner. A cross-sectional questionnaire was used to collect data from doctors. Most doctors are aware of the applications of stem cells, but they do not confirm their usage because clinical trials are ongoing. Instead, they show support for using stem cells to treat patients. Stem cells have been hoping to help repair damaged tissues in the respiratory system to promote faster recovery. Stem Cells are being studied in current clinical trials for their efficacy and safety in virus severe pneumonia and respiratory infections. The doctors suggested that stem cells have been used in infectious diseases to improve their health.Copyright © 2023 Health Biotechnology And Biopharma. All rights reserved.